• Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thats because a lot of lemmy users see right wing as being evil.

    The reality is the right is not evil. Supporting genocidal dictators like Stalin and Mao is.

        • YEP [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He sourcing from a book fairly widely discredited by academics. Adding on to the wildly discredited notion that the Soviet famine was intentional. Like this is literally cold war propaganda people were paroting in the 80s. Embarrassing

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Adding on to the wildly discredited notion that the Soviet famine was intentional

            The fuck, have you ever heard of the Holodomor? Family members of people I know had people die of hunger because russian soldiers would confiscate all their food right before winter. Sick fucks.

            • YEP [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have heard of it that is why I referenced it, this argument has been raging for decades. The idea of a terror famine has been pushed in popular media even though it is not the common view held by experts in the field of study. I’ll link one of the funnier exchanges on the subject in Getty’s review of Conquest’s harvest of sorrow (one of the more more widely cited sources in popular culture of the intentional famine narrative) in the London review of books.

              https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v09/n02/j.-arch-getty/starving-the-ukraine

              For context this was also written before western academics has access to the Soviet archives which further served to vindicate the Getty’s criticism of the narrative.

              No one denies that there was death and hardship. When you call something genocide you are saying there was a deliberate effort to eradicate a peoples, there isn’t sufficient evidence of intentionality or malice to come to the conclusion of genocide. You can say there was a poorly planned and executed state policy(I personally think it could have been better handled) but it also ignores the global context of wide spread crop failures at the time, for example in the north American dust bowl or the West African famines (I’d argue you can make a much more substantiated claim of genocide in West Africa). It also ignores the material conditions that Soviet agriculture at the time was underdeveloped because of the serfdom under the tsars.

              I don’t expect us to reconcile but when your response is just my grandma says so you come off as unserious and that’s why you are getting dunked on. In America a popular boomer conspiracy that people will attest to is that there were Jews celebrating when 9/11 happened it doesn’t mean it’s correct or should be taken seriously.