• Addv4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sounds like they are trying to crack down on people trying to print bump stocks or something. Truly sounds like a damn stupid sisyphisian task that can be used to survail what is being printed on common printers.

    • nul9o9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are small modifications that can be done to convert guns to full auto. Glock switches and auto seers, or what not. The idea of usi g this to spy on printers is frustrating.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          3D printers are no longer limited to a single plastic. They can use wood, metal, carbon fiber and even organic materials these days.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Also, material sciences have flourished. Lots of plastics can even outperform metal in specific tasks

            • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              right, but are they making these out of plastic? the article says tiny pieces of plastic.

      • Addv4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep. Plus, what measures would be required to defeat basic printer blocks? Could it defect differences in tolerance? What if you redesigned an internal part to make the overall print slightly different? It an endless task that doesn’t seem like it will be very useful for anything other than random surveillance.

        • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          probably some sort of comparison list of shapes that it can’t produce. like how photocopy and printer manufacturers make it so you can’t copy legal tender

          • Addv4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, but when you are doing that you are basically just comparing to what it can’t be. This would be looking at any possible way to design a mechanism to (for instance) turn a semi auto to a full auto, which is to say having something that can independently look at stuff, automatically redesign them in all of the unexpected ways, and ban those from ever being printed.

            • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think at best they’re going to be playing a catch up game at all times. it might be nice and easy for printers that are connected to the internet and can get regular updates, but it doesn’t take a genius to airgap his printer