• SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’ve invalidated my reasoning. Luckily, I can keep repeating my ageism.

    Good luck with that, kiddo.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, you have not invalidated my reasoning I’m afraid, all you did was point out that revenues are not the whole picture. While true, this does not equate to the MIC being what suddenly pays the bills. To do so, it would have to either directly or indirectly contribute to the coffers the majority of the money spent. It does not, not even close.

      You can blather about geopolitics all you want, but at the end of the day a budget is a budget, and most of the money comes from a very wide variety of domestic sources that the military has no relation to. The health care industry, for instance, does extensive lobbying to the parties. No military relation, and that’s just one example.

      Your ideas are out of date. By a couple decades. Which is extremely common on here, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if you started discussing petro-dollars and an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Middle East next, like so many of the other people on here.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        You shouldn’t expect me to waste time reading paragraphs after you’ve demonstrated your shallow understanding, kiddo.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Very cute. I don’t expect you to admit when you’re wrong, but I just want it to be clear to any other readers that you have no idea what you’re talking about.