• schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    no, this is one of the worst answers on Stack Overflow

    OP had a specific question to capture opening tags. The thing OP asked about can be done with regular expressions. It is true that arbitrarily nested languages like HTML cannot generally be parsed with regular expressions, but that is not what OP asked about.

    • moriquende@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It can’t be done, as an opening tag in html can contain anything in its attributes, even JavaScript (e.g. onclick handler).

        • moriquende@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can’t parse every html opening tag with regex, because a html opening tag doesn’t have a set structure. How would you match, with regex, this opening tag? <mytag myattribute="<value of \"myattribute\">" >

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Is this valid HTML? My understanding is that that attribute value needs to be escaped, i.e. &lt;value of \&quot;myattribute\&quot;&gt;.

            • moriquende@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The quote must not be escaped when you start with a single quote. The rest doesn’t. This is valid and tested: <img alt='my "<img>"'>

    • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is StackOverflow after all. Your question is wrong. Your problem is wrong. You are wrong. I am right. Thread locked. Go read this other post that is totally unrelated to your problem I’ve decided isn’t the problem you’re facing because. I. Am. Right.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Could be worse. At least it’s not Microsoft’s support forums:

        Hey, I see you’re having problems with <copy-paste key words from OP>. Try the following and see if it fixes your issue.

        Open a command prompt and enter ”sfc /scannow".

        I hope this helps!

        (Reply marked as solution, thread closed.)

        • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The thing with Windows is that the three magical commands (sfc, that DISM tool, fixboot) will usually fix most weird OS problems. To the point where any Windows troubleshooting session should include either the results of the first two, or instructions to use them.

          Once SFC and DISM can’t fix your install, you reinstall Windows. There are alternatives, but if you’d know them you wouldn’t be asking random Windows users on a forum. You can figure out a lot by enabling various tracing and logging features, listing open file handles and tracking file system calls, but the moment you need to take out sysmon you’re either in for a weekend of troubleshooting or wasting your time.

          Similarly, there are oneliners for Linux that’ll reinstall every package installed on the system and that has helped me recover my broken systems several times.

          • captain_samuel_brady@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Magic may be an overstatement. I would be shocked if any of them fixed even 0.1% of the problems posted to Microsoft’s joke of a support forum where they were presented as solutions.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I have X years experience with {keyword salad}.

          Can you confirm {details already in the opening post}?

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s why LLMs are so infuriatingly stubborn, they’re trained on these keyboard warriors

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had a decade old question marked as a duplicate and downvoted three times after years no no activity. SE is such a joke nowadays.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It can be done with simple regex of the kind proposed in various answers there iff the html is known to be limited to the subset of html where that sort of thing can easily be made to work. The question does not tell us whether or not that is the case, so everyone is free to make their own assumptions and argue as if they know what’s going on.