• purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Except in 99% of cases the person is asking an xy problem, and if they ever explained the why, they would get a proper answer.

    Often the reason no one does the hyper-specific thing, is that there are better non code solutions, it’s massively insecure, or is just stupid micromanaging.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      and if they ever explained the why, they would get a proper answer.

      That’s funny, every time I’ve explained in detail why my question isn’t a duplicate nobody fucking cares and it still gets closed.

    • HStone32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know, when I typically ask a question on SO, its because I want to learn how that thing works, or how to write it myself. I usually say as much, but the SO folks are too focused on the ends, they completely neglect the means. Chances are I’m already aware of that no-code solution, but that’s not what I’m asking for.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think there’s an element of responsibility that some people feel when they respond. If you’re asking for a very niche solution that is likely to create other problems in the future, should anyone else look at your code or refactor it or rely on it, or should you forget how it works, perhaps people are going to be less inclined in helping you craft it.

        If you still want to craft it, that’s okay, but you have to expect that some real percent of the answers are going to be those folk who know what the tried and true solution is, often because they’ve lived through the reality that you’re attempting to create and they’ve dealt with the aftermath of doing it special and different.