• Freeman@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “We only use x% of our brain.”

    Simply not true as shown since years by neurology

    • Waker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This reminds me of the “you eat X amount of spiders in your sleep every year”. It’s also been debunked so many times and I see it popping up from time to time.

      Even more ironic, this was created by some professor (?) to prove that starting fake viral facts was easy or something…

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man, I always thought that one was suspect. If I eat 10 per year and have been alive 40+ years, then surely one of those times I would have woken up.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The customer is always right” conveniently missing the second part: “…in matters of taste and style”.

    Also misinterpreting “customer” as an individual rather than as the aggregate of customer demand.

  • umbraklat@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My least favorite is

    Just be yourself!

    Even in grade school I knew this was hogwash. I didn’t act the same in class as during recess, or in church as when at the dinner table. Exactly which me was I supposed to be? When someone asks, “What am I supposed to do?” They are really asking, “How should I behave?” And if you’ve never been on a date before, or this is your first job interview, then it’s not obvious.

    A: “So, how did the interview go?”

    B: “Not so well, he threw my resume away, in front of me, and ordered me to leave.”

    A: “What? Why?”

    B: “Well, I did just as your said, I was being myself. I walked in, gave him the ol’ finger guns, then started with my best fart joke.”

    A: “Why the hell would you do that at an interview?”

    B: “Because that routine always slays in the dorms and I was trying to be myself.”

    • 31415926535@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anybody on the autism spectrum just laughs sadly, shakes head quietly, when told ‘just be your self’

    • ELI70@lemmy.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      ask yourself: is it possible to be anybody else? no? then this saying is non-nonsensical!

  • Navarian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unsure if this counts as a quote but here goes.

    If you can’t handle me at my worst, you don’t deserve me at my best

    Absolute fucking nonsense.

  • Bady@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Survival of the fittest” (when used without trying to understand its actual meaning).

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is from Darwin, I think. It describes the mechanism of selection in evolution: the organisms that are better adapted to their environments are the ones more likely to survive.

        Bady likely hates it because it’s often misused, by transforming it in a prescriptive statement (from “the fittest survives” to "the fittest deserves to survive) and/or ignoring that what’s considered the fittest depends on the environment (e.g. a fish isn’t fit in a dry environment, but a cactus isn’t fit in the sea).

          • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Social “Darwinism” relies on the fallacy that I mentioned, where you treat a descriptive statement as if it was prescriptive. (And yes, it’s nasty.)

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fittest means most suited to the environmwnt, not necessarily strongest, fastest, smartest etc

  • maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You can’t have your cake and eat it too”. What is the flaming point of having cake if you can’t eat it?

    • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One time I baked a whole entire cake for myself. There was no occasion or anything I just wanted to have a cake and eat it too. It turns out cakes are really big and it’s really hard for a single person to eat a cake faster than it turns all spongy and icky.

    • umbraklat@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wondered about this for years and years, never understanding, especially, since “having cake” and “eating cake” are used interchangeably. But, I finally figured it out! In this sense, the “having” is equivalent to “keeping” or “being in possession of.”

      Examples:

      • “What’s it like having a Mercedes Benz?”
      • “The Smiths have a very nice home.”

      No eating implied!

      Therefore, the saying is more inline with “You can’t keep (to show off or admire) your cake, and eat it, too.”

  • derivator@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh sweet summer child

    Yeah we get it, we’ve all seen Game of Thrones, too. If you have to be a condescending dick, at least be original.