• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The fun thing is that with novel cases, the law can change. There’s currently no precedent for AI Camera Glasses, and the law(s) I cited were created before anything like this was even a real possibility for the average person.

    And re: phones—you can see that’s a camera. Also, they have a bright LED that indicates recording. These glasses do not.

    I get your cynicism, but we do not yet live in the dystopian plutocracy where companies get to do whatever they want with impunity (just a lot of it). Unless you’re a lawyer, I’m not inclined towards your opinion.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And re: phones—you can see that’s a camera. Also, they have a bright LED that indicates recording. These glasses do not.

      Umm when was the last time you…you know what, let’s do an experiment, start recording a video on your phone, flip it over and look at the back and tell me where the red recording LED is LOL

      Anyways, the other commenter here cited specific cases and a supreme court ruling which tied recording in a public space as a 1st amendment issue (which I didn’t know either) so now short of a new federal law passed by congress, it ain’t changing. It’s not my opinion, it’s a fact.

    • Maeve@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      About the time some billionaire/politician/LEO/judge out other influential/affluent person is recorded in a compromising position.