• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s paying to rebuild infrastructure where the state government has been neglecting.

    Besides Texas, none of those states listed are population dense or otherwise rich. In fact the low population density may require the cost per subscriber to be significantly higher because more infrastructure is required to bring service to fewer people. This is a perfect example of good federal government spending.

    Is your preference that if these regions can’t afford to build/maintain this infrastructure they should go without?