• PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who is responsible for providing for people who choose not to contribute?

    I’m not working away all day when I could be persuing a hobby and still getting paid just so someone else can persue a hobby and get paid

    • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not talking about luxuries or even a comfortable life, I just think that everyone should have enough to live under a roof and have enough to eat healthy every day.

      • V4ty6BybVXjr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good goal. But it’s also fair to expect people to pay their own way.

        Arguably an ‘elite athlete’ is just an extreme hobbyist. And again, a hobby is not a job. If you can get someone to pay you for it, bully for you, but i personally don’t want my taxes paying for some randomer to run harder/better/faster/stronger than some other randomer.

        Give me bike lanes!

    • root@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would think being an elite athlete is way beyond just a hobby.

      Running a few laps around the field every day, yes a hobby. Being faster or able to run farther than 95% of the Australian population, that’s way beyond hobby levels.

      • PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        These are activities that only exist for the sake of the participants and are not financially self-sufficient

        They may be super intense hobbies, but if they aren’t jobs or charitable services, they are still hobbies