• TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I responded directly to what they said re: there being multiple issues they want to weigh. That was their response up me challenging complicity in genocide and asking why the person I was responding to was sheepdogging for genociders. They are trying yo be euphemistic and retreat to the thought-terminsting clichés that reinforce complicity in genocide, which also means avoiding even using the word. So I recontextualized their attempt to decontextualize while still directly addressing it.

      Please feel free to tell me which specific parts you would like to see addressed or responded to. I certainly already replied to the first sentence, which was the main point of deflection.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        So, you admit to intentionally mischaracterizing what they said and then creating a straw man argument based on that, just so you could win an online argument.

        Not that you haven’t been doing that this whole time, but it’s nice for you to admit it.