• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Your hypothetical is false, though, the Dems and Reps have been working together to support genocide. The GOP isn’t going to go harder on it than the DNC already have been, because they can’t.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not a hypothetical, it’s an example. The statement was made “There is no better or worse in actively arming and participating in a genocide.” I showed that’s not true.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The answer to a question doesn’t matter because it doesn’t fit your agenda. I get it. A statement was made, in general, not about these candidates. A moral stance. I showed the fallacy of that stance. We’re not talking about what’s happening right now, I’m talking about how that moral stance isn’t valid.

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Nope, not at all. You’re ignoring the points being made to attack me directly and make wild claims. Never have I said genocide is ok or should be defended. Never did I say what either side is doing is ok, I actually called it bad if you would read what I wrote. I’m just realistic enough to see that rigid ideals hurt more people than help.

              Can you at least admit that the moral stance of “There is no better or worse in actively arming and participating in a genocide” is invalid? Or do you think sending $10 is the same as sending $10 billion?

    • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The GOP isn’t going to go harder on it than the DNC already have been, because they can’t.

      Oh, I assure you… they can, and they will.