• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think we have a misunderstanding - I know a good portion of the Fairphone team personally, I am very convinced of their altruistic motivations and good work ethics - and they wouldn’t sabotage LineageOS. However, they have not been prioritizing FOSS chips, because the fair trade is the core design criterion. But I am a bit frustrated that they also didn’t prioritize maintainability for the FP1 (no more SW updates after < 5 years I think) and FP2 (spare parts were no longer available by the time my USB module started to fall apart). And unfortunately, they are also not focusing on having a proper Linux (postmarketOS) with a docking station on the Fairphones.

    So I just meant they might be hiding the lack of support as of the release date for alternative OSes. The company and the people are decent :) And they have at least one who used to work in the postmarketOS community that they hired specifically for alternate OS support, if I am not mistaken.

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds really impressive. I agree that it is slightly hard to accept that they are not doing all the good, but good enough is still way better than bad, like most other manufacture.

      I love that they have people working on postmarketOS on their teams. I hope they will be the change we need to see in the linux phone space.