Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.world · 1 year agoFairphone 5 - The Ars Technica Reviewarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1271arrow-down112
arrow-up1259arrow-down1external-linkFairphone 5 - The Ars Technica Reviewarstechnica.comRade0nfighter@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squaredx1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoAudio quality loss and latency are built into Bluetooth. Its only advantage is not having a wire.
minus-squareSCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoI’m not talking about Bluetooth at all tho
minus-squaredx1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoOh, you mean USB headphones? TBH, way overly complex compared to analog with (albeit negligible) audio quality loss, which still works with legacy tech going back decades. It’s like arguing a bicycle is obsolete because motorcycles exist.
minus-squareSCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoIf bicycles and motorcycles competed for the exact same role, with an opportunity cost allowing only one, how would bicycles not be obsolete?
minus-squareSCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI didn’t choose the analogy.
Audio quality loss and latency are built into Bluetooth. Its only advantage is not having a wire.
I’m not talking about Bluetooth at all tho
Oh, you mean USB headphones? TBH, way overly complex compared to analog with (albeit negligible) audio quality loss, which still works with legacy tech going back decades. It’s like arguing a bicycle is obsolete because motorcycles exist.
If bicycles and motorcycles competed for the exact same role, with an opportunity cost allowing only one, how would bicycles not be obsolete?
What a dumb analogy.
I didn’t choose the analogy.