• DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Normally I’m not a “lesser of two evils” type, but nuclear is such an immensely lesser evil compared to coal and oil that it’s insane people are still against it.

    • MrMukagee@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Especially when you start counting the number of people that have died either directly or indirectly from coal, oil and every fossil fuel.

      If your extrapolate the data into the next hundred years … fossil fuels will have responsible for the deaths of billions.

      Compared to nuclear energy … fossil fuels is killing us slowly and will kill us all if we don’t stop using them.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I spoke with a far left friend of mine about this. His position essentially boiled down to the risk of a massive nuclear disaster outweighed the benefits. I said what about the known disastrous consequences of coal and oil? Didn’t really have a response to that. It doesn’t make sense to me. I’ll roll those dice and take the .00001% chance risk or whatever.

      • normalmighty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, nuclear is to fossil fuels as planes are to cars, safety wise. Sure it’s a huge deal when an accident occurs, but that’s because accidents are drastically more rare.

      • whogivesashit@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nuclear is fantastic and would have been even more fantastic 30 years ago. But it’s 2023 and renewables are getting better every day. There’s just no real reason to not invest primarily in green energy sources, especially when the track record on nuclear waste management is abysmal. People will say “oh but the resources, oh but the storage, oh but the blah blah blah”. We act like these things can’t be done, but they are being done all over the place. While the US argues about whether solar is viable, China has almost produced more solar panels in a year than the US has ever produced. And they are planning to try and deliver to other countries with less productive capacity as well.

        • solstice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I love the nuclear waste storage argument. Wouldn’t it be grand if we could just stick it in the atmosphere like we do with coal and oil? Smh…

          • whogivesashit@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Thing is bad, therefore other things that’s not as bad is good. Yo your brain is fucking melted lmao

            • solstice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              8 day old account, second post is to be an asshole to me for no reason. Classy. You’re either a bot or another shitty lemming. You’ll fit right in here with all the other insufferable shitheads in this forum.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think you’re misreading the room. People are against nuclear because they’re for renewables, not because they’re for fossil fuels.