• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Except if you look at China today it clearly worked. It’s an evidence based scientific approach to politics. No faith necessary.

    Meanwhile, religious people can’t prove anything and have no evidence for anything and have to take everything on faith.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      scientific approach to politics

      It’s not, because no approach to politics is. It’s not reproducible, and there’s no control. You can argue it’s logical, but that’s different.

      Also, this means that literally any functioning state “clearly works” as well, many of which have been around longer than modern China. Any place that isn’t pure chaos is a valid approach to politics with this argument, and if you (correctly) change what you mean by “works” to be some other criteria, then it’s not a pure evidence based approach anymore since we’ve brought value judgements into it.

      Politics can never be purely scientific because we have to make value judgements. Being purely “scientific” is what most communists criticize pure utilitarianism for.