• APassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    FOSS = principled free software without obligation because the labor was “donated.”

    That’s what I’m learning on lemmy. It’s blowing my mind.

    Edit: exiting to make sure I’m understood. I get FOSS. I understand it’s role. What I’m learning is there is a while corner of the internet determined not to spend money on software.

    And feeling significant moral outrage if someone else does. It’s bizarre. I’ve seen religious people less zealous.

    • jackpot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      also yeah it stands for free open source software and FLOSS means it’s licensed in a way which prevents it from being closed off later on

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m fairness, FOSS development is not as expensive. You usually are basing your work on previous libraries. Everyone builds off each other so nobody has to do it alone. That’s FOSS

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have nothing against FOSS. Good things have been done.

        I have an issue with people acting like if it isn’t FOSS it is morally wrong. You may not have done this, but it’s a vibe I’ve seen more than once here.

        That and a notion that the app should be free. That’s fine, but if people are “saving money” I hope it goes to the servers or lemmy devs.

        In short: an undercurrent to some FOSS posts has seemed to be entitlement, not just a desire to see FOSS thrive.

    • jackpot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      theres no obligation but if they dont get paid theyve no obligation to help us, it’s mutually benefitial