German energy giant RWE has begun dismantling a wind farm to make way for a further expansion of an open-pit lignite coal mine in the western region of North Rhine Westphalia.

I thought renewables were cheaper than coal. How is this possible?

  • UlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you care about energy density, nuclear is the best solution, not coal. I guess Germans don’t care though

    • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germans literally shut down all thier nuclear power in favour for coal power.

      • mineapple@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was meant to be replaced by renewables but our minister of economics dumped the whole solar and wind turbine industry. Additionally his party made up bullshit rules about a minimum distance for turbines to households, which was apparently 10x of the reasonable distance and which made it very hard to find spots in densely populated Germany. And to this day, the federations with a renewable energy surplus have to pay more for electricity than those who give a shit about renewables. -it is discussed to be changed now but idk

    • A2PKXG@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t say density is the paramount parameter. Also, once you optimize one drawback, it generally gets less important.

      I just wanted to put the image into context, and show that it isn’t a big step backwards, just sideways perhaps. Or in other words, a sigle wind farm isn’t relevant, the sum is