• SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s not soorts teams. Going further left means reaching rural people and poor people. A lot of the working class just isn’t aware of what left and right mean. If the left let’s republican dictate who is taking those ppl’s side this is how it’s auways gonna end. Posh elitism has failed yet again

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There was an election between an independent union leader and a career politician in Nebraska and the career politician won by a landslide. How do you explain that?

      • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The career politician ran a better campaign and lied more believably.

        Also not all union leaders are left wing, paradoxically. There are legitimate reasons that Americans distrust unions.

      • niucllos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        One example does not a rule make, and in the US electoral system money (and the party affiliations that bring it) speaks loudest of all. Maybe going further left wouldn’t work, but going further right certainly hasn’t. When Harris first emerged as the candidate she had such a swell of support, as she moved further right she lost it.