President-elect Donald Trump stunned the Pentagon and the broader defense world by nominating Fox News host Pete Hegseth to serve as his defense secretary, tapping someone largely inexperienced and untested on the global stage to take over the world’s largest and most powerful military.

Archive link

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The military will be effective at what ever it’ll do. You should hope it maintains some sanity at least. Like a loaded gun won’t jam just because a crazy person picked it up.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Right…i think the metaphor train has derailed here.

            What possible action do you think the military could be ordered to do, that will harm its capability to wage war, and will not result in even more innocent people getting killed than the regular levels of evil? Or is this a ‘acceptable collateral damage as long as its not me’ type of thing?

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                That sounds really bad. Apologies but if this is all sarcasm, that is lost on me. I got people arguing that Trump helping Isreal finish the genocide quickly with be good for the Palestinians who live through it, and so sarcasm is long dead.

                  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Ok… but to argue that to privatize war making to the lowest bidder sounds like the premise to a libertarian monkey paw nightmare. Like current mercenaries track record with human rights violations is…well poor would be an understatement. And what is the issue you have with NATO?

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Disband 20% of it’s career leadership.

              Zero out pentagon funding.

              Withdraw from NATO.

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                And this is what you are arguing that trump will do? Or should do? And you are aware of its full consequences?

                • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Withdrawing from NATO, I could see Trump entertaining that (wouldn’t actually happen).

                  Fire a bunch of the top leadership? For sure. That would both be something Trump could “order the military to do,” as well as something he might do, and it would also harm the US military’s capability to wage war.

                  Zero out Pentagon funding? Not possible for trump to do alone, but depending on the congressional make up, it could be done and would severely limit the ability of the US Military to wage war. They could even do it without affecting enlisted personnel enrollment. The Pentagon has their own funding 100% separate from military spending.

                  Could also deny all future discretionary spending for the military/pentagon.