• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Even in Marx’s time, there was stock speculation, he even won money on the stock market on occasion. The Bourgeoisie are owners of Capital, this includes large financial and stock Capital as well. The subsection of the bourgeoisie that faces proletarianization is the Petite Bourgeoisie.

      You’d do well to read Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        You didn’t answer my question, and now I have another.

        How did he invest in stocks if there wasn’t a Soviet stock system? Russia created the RTS (Russian Trading System) in 1995.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          “I have, which will surprise you not a little, been speculating — partly in American funds, but more especially in English stocks, which are springing up like mushrooms this year (in furtherance of every imaginable and unimaginable joint stock enterprise), are forced up to quite an unreasonable level and then, for the most part, collapse. In this way, I have made over £400 and, now that the complexity of the political situation affords greater scope, I shall begin all over again. It’s a type of operation that makes demands on one’s time, and it’s worth while running some risk in order to relieve the enemy of his money.”

          -Karl Marx, 1864.

          This isn’t about the RTS, but about stock ownership.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            That’s not owning the means of production of his own people. You’re altering perspective to match your system.

            In the US, the wealthiest class are the oppressors. They own means of production through stock ownership or connections to Blackrock, State Street, Vanguard, etc. The middle class may have some local control in small scale, but corporate America is owned by the 1%.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The bourgeoisie are not the middle class, but the wealthiest 1%. The Petite Bourgeoisie are the middle class. The Bourgeoisie used to be the middle class until they collaborated with the proletariat and petite bourgeoisie to overthrow the aristocracy.

                  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    The intention of the questions I’ve been asking was to understand your point. You didn’t answer any of them.

                    Also, I’m done conversing with someone who instantly has two upvotes after every comment. You clearly have a second account because being perceived as correct is so important to you.

                    Have fun always being right.