• spacedout@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sorry for being snarky… Of course modern China is an empire. Just without overseas military bases. A soft empire, one might say.

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        4 Chinese bases, as compared to 800 or so US bases. And what is the death toll of Chinese military interventions since the second World War? Not sure, but it certainly isn’t racking up to the millions upon millions killed by US foreign intervention. Like the other commenter is saying, don’t support nation states, good on you. But doing bothsidesism and false balances when talking about Empire is absurd. Like calling US empire ‘less problematic’ 🤡

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          China is still in their phase of keeping their interventions within their borders. The “trail of tears phase” so to say

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Of course modern China is an empire. Just without overseas military bases. A soft empire, one might say.

          4 Chinese bases

          So China does have oversees bases and is therefore in fact not a “soft empire” but a fully fledged empire.

          Don’t know why you bring up the US, we were talking about China. Which is by your definition an empire and should be treated as such.

          • spacedout@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, foreign bases does not an empire make. If that was the case, watch out for Bangladesh. This dick measuring between nation states is unproductive and serves to legitimize imperialism itself. Rather than comparing oppressions, our focus should be on understanding and opposing the global system that enables imperial powers to divide and exploit working people worldwide.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        TF you mean ‘assimilated’

        If I lease you a part of my house (AT GUNPOINT NO LESS) for 10 years am I doing an imperial aggression when I move my stuff back in afterwards?

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m strongly of the belief, by reading them in the context provided, that you don’t know what any of those words mean

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Imperialism - building an empire by exerting control over foreign powers

              de jure - by law

              cassus belli - cause for war

              So conquering other places is okay when the law says you have a good reason to send soldiers marching down their streets?

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Okay so 2 out of 3 correct.

                Now I guess the question is with your sanity. What the fuck are you talking about with ‘conquering’ and ‘other places’? It is literally their country. There was no war. There was no invasion.

                You’re delusional.