• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What I heard (on here, and I hope it’s a vicious rumor) is that TPM 2.0 comes with backdoors accessible to Microsoft via the OS so that a significant chunk of the computer belongs to Big MS and not to the end user, and it will squeal and cause problems if the end user tries to take it back.

    The whole point of TPM 1.0 hypothetically was to allow a larger secondary encryption key of a device to be accessible only by a small user-provided key (say a four-digit PIN), and requiring use of the key-query software to run to get the secondary key. A limited number of chances with longer delays with each wrong answer heightens security.

    But this pissed off government law enforcement across the world, who want backdoors for when they want to crack the phone of a very important criminal.

    It would be nice if Apple, Google and Microsoft had more respect for their end users than they do national and corporate institutions, but we know this isn’t really the case, so it’s at least plausible that TPMs 1.0 or 2.0 come pre-backdoored. It doesn’t hurt that this is exactly what FBI and NSA want even though (Pre-9/11 and Pre-PATRIOT) NSA is supposed to be assuring that no-one, not even police can crack our secure communication protocols.

    Despite efforts to look into it, I’ve yet to get an answer I can fully trust whether or not they are backdoored. But since Microsoft is notorious for exactly this kind of bullshit since the 1980s, I assume it’s true that TPMs are backdoored until I find convincing information otherwise.

        • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You are making the claims, the onus is on you to cite your sources.

          Do you have any trustworthy sources to back up these bullshit claims? I didn’t think so. Now, fuck off.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Yeah, I claimed it was a plausible rumor, and given Win10 and Win11 are already spyware and resistant to end-user full control, I already have strong cause to distrust Microsoft, which is what I said.

            So chill your reactor before it melts down. Unless you want a block, because this is how you get a block.

            • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s also plausible that you are the zodiac killer. I heard that you’re an asshole on the road and that you’re an inconsiderate prick who doesn’t return his shopping cart to the corral.

              See how that works? Don’t spread bullshit and FUD.

              You can block as much as you want, you’re still gonna get called out on your shit, the difference is that you’ll be the only one who doesn’t see it.