Pennsylvania plans to end on Dec. 31 its longstanding contract with the nonprofit Real Alternatives, the first organization in the nation to secure significant state and federal subsidies to support anti-abortion counseling centers. Under the program, Real Alternatives distributed the state and federal funds to dozens of Pennsylvania centers, including Catholic Charities, anti-abortion counseling centers and maternity homes, which provide support and housing for pregnant women.

Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro said in a statement his administration would not “continue that pattern” of subsidizing the organization, saying he was steadfast in defending abortion access.

Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars across the U.S. have been sent to such organizations, which are typically religiously affiliated. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the right to abortion last year, Republican-led states have sent more tax dollars to what are sometimes called “crisis pregnancy centers,” while Democratic-leaning states apply more scrutiny to them.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good.

    These places often disguise as places to “support women and pregnancy” and often are just places to guilt and pressure. Literally state sponsored religion.

    • query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If not outright kidnap people. People don’t know what they’re going in to, they don’t tell them “come here to not have an abortion”, they pretend they care about them only to do everything they can to stop them accessing healthcare.

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember when there was a real fear the elections would go to an insurrectionist and a snake oil salesman. Phew.

  • NYPariah @reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is such a backward state. I mean we have State liquor stores. I’ll take any hint of progressive movement forward.

    • KrombopulosMikl @lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. We can’t have state run vehicle inspections, but we have state run liquor stores.

      I’m originally from FL. Once upon a time it was a liberal state, but it’s constantly flooded with new immigrants from the north that don’t want to pay taxes (aka Freeloaders) who are mostly right wingers. I’m hopeful that this trend will continue and that enough right wingers from PA will move there and result in PA becoming a little less conservative.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh? Most Canadian provinces have provincial liquor store, like SAQ, LCBO and MBLL. I don’t think that part is particularly backwards. Quebec even has the provincial SQDC store for cannabis.

  • watson387@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t even know this existed and apparently I’ve been paying for it with my tax dollars. I don’t donate to the Salvation Army anymore because of shit like this. Tax dollars should never have been used for it.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not as offended at the mere existence of these places as many of you are. There are people whose religious beliefs are that life begins at conception. We keep complaining that these people don’t value people post-birth enough, yet here they are helping mothers who want to keep their babies. These people who are backing up those beliefs with their own money and effort. As long as they’re being honest in what they do and not deceptive, what’s wrong with that?

    I don’t even have an issue with government money going to it, but it has been proven that some in Government can’t resist the urge to play favorites. Any arguments that apply to Planned Parenthood’s government funding also apply to these places. I’m my view, they are doing the same work, and should be dealt with the same way.

    Supporting a woman’s right to choose should also include supporting her right to keep her pregnancy. Of course, Planned Parenthood supports that, too. But there’s no reason to dismiss these other organizations out of hand because they won’t help women who want to end their pregnancy, due to their religious beliefs – as long as those women still have accessible choices.