• wandermind@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    And your argument was off the rails to begin with when you decided to defend Russian imperialism.

      • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        And I’m acknowledging the context you’re leaving out: that Russia has been an expansionist, imperialist oppressor country for centuries, and that the newest excuses are just that - excuses. Can’t you see how Putin is playing you, using your commendable anti-Nazi position to get you to unintentionally defend his imperialistic talking points?

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’re not exactly in a position to be pretending your anti-expansionist, while you’re defending NATO.

          • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            NATO does not annex land. Russia does. I am not against willing countries joining their forces. I am against wars of conquest where one party subjugates the other or steals their land. Countries apply to join NATO, and many of those who want to join are not invited to join. Ukraine among them. What was the last time a country willingly joined Russia?

              • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                So do I understand your point correctly, that what NATO has done is wrong, and therefore what Russia is doing is also wrong?

                  • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    Then we don’t disagree.

                    Do we also agree that, as a hypothetical, even though both sides do things which are wrong, both sides can also sometimes do things which are good?

                    And, again as a hypothetical, do we agree that one of these good things is helping a third country which is the victim to one of the wrongs of the other country?

                    Such as the Soviet Union helping the Vietnamese fight off the Americans.

                    Or America helping Ukraine fight off Russia.