• Chakravanti@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        When the role is purchaseable, the title is a flair and the true name is the target painted on the skull.

        The true title’s applicability applies to those who truely earned it based on every fucking thing other than money. I think everyone has already spoken. The only people who disagree are using money to disagree.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lol I know. Isn’t that fucking wild? Really shows how the media operates. Blatant as fuck.

        • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          So I thought the same thing, but it’s apparently always the president-elect. so while you’re right, i don’t think this is a good example.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well it was gonna be Osama in 2001, but people didn’t actually get that it’s not a positive award.

            Person of the Year (called Man of the Year or Woman of the Year until 1999)[1] is an annual issue of the American news magazine and website Time featuring a person, group, idea, or object that “for better or for worse … has done the most to influence the events of the year”.

      • coyootje@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m surprised they didn’t choose that healthcare CEO guy for his stellar work quietly and legally murdering people.