• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Going to copy paste my comment from elsewhere


    He started the process for medical marijuana legalization in 2022 via rescheduling to schedule 3 (Harris had called for full legalization, Biden only called for medical). It’s not as simple as a singular executive order when done without congressional action alone. The existing law makes the process very convoluted to reschedule. Lots of steps inbetween with people that have actively tried to slow it down

    The formal rule for it ended up being fully proposed in May 2024, and the DEA has dragged it out and kept delaying it. The DEA managed to push the inital first hearing out until Dec 2nd and there keep being legal challenges from outside groups to push it back further and further


    Dems also tried getting it through via legislation which is much faster. Passed in the house but it died in the senate

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3617

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      So why’d he fuck off until 2022 instead of starting it on Inauguration Day?

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Maybe because there was a freaking pandemic to focus on. (Besides that the other guy said they did.)

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Because legislation was a much faster route so they started there. It took a bit before died in the senate

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, that’s bullshit. There is absolutely no excuse why he couldn’t have worked on both processes at the same time.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dems also tried getting it through via legislation which is much faster. Passed in the house but it died in the senate

      Gee. How could that have happened in the Senate that Democrats controlled at the time?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          We gave Democrats a majority. We gave them the opportunity. They didn’t do what we elected them to do.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Joe Manchin is barely a democrat - though he’s probably the best you’d get out of West Virginia. In other parts of the world, he’d be a different party and he’s already left the Democratic party

            Look, Biden could have just gone home, blamed Manchin, called it a day on so many issues but he didn’t. He actually tried to do what he could via executive action in many areas. He got zero credit for quite significant legislation and executive action

            He managed to get one of the largest US climate bill through (Inflation Reduction Act), large infrastructure investments, etc.

            Biden has many many faults. You don’t need to claim there’s ones in the areas where he did really try and got only shit on for it

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Joe Manchin is barely a democrat

              Joe Manchin’s obstruction is the last word people got from the Democratic Party on a host of issues.

              Look, Biden could have just gone home, blamed Manchin, called it a day on so many issues but he didn’t.

              Like he did with most of BBB, yes.

              He got zero credit for quite significant legislation and executive action

              That’s what happens when you spend decades being on the wrong side of issues, as Biden was with both cannabis and student loans. You don’t get credit for slapping a tiny store-brand bandaid over the problems you made a career out of creating and exacerbating. Especially when the tiny store-brand bandaid falls off.

              He managed to get one of the largest US climate bill through (Inflation Reduction Act)

              Centrists really overestimate the popularity of that law. Sometimes they wait a whole other sentence before gloating about record oil production.

              Biden has many many faults. You don’t need to claim there’s ones in the areas where he did really try and got only shit on for it

              His other faults make me disinclined to carry water for him.

              • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 day ago

                You mistake me for a centrist, and that I am not. You mistake me as a fan of Biden, and that too I am not


                Yes, we definitely need so much more. We’re not going to get it if we shit on any and every single piece of good news. We’re just going to end up with people too burnt out to do anything. Take the small wins and use them as motivate to build for much larger change we need

                A lot of activists put work to make those changes. I am defending the activists and people who put the work in and got wins that no one acknowledges


                In history, it’s almost always been the people like that who get change through even with imperfect and flawed people. Lincoln didn’t decide to free enslaved people on his own. He only opposed its expansion and even at that he was quite weak on it. He was willing to give much of that up to stop the civil war at first. But he was closer to the goal of abolitionists and they worked hard to get him to change his tune. Fredrick Douglas is often the classic example of that. He was pissed by Lincoln, called him the “white man’s president” and kept speaking with him in the hopes that he’d actually do what he said he would do and go beyond it

                They eventually started to get concessions even if for frustrating reasons. They needed more union soliders and so they convinced to make a mostly symbolic gesture of the emancipation proclamation. It only freed enslaved people when the union regained land. It didn’t free any of the enslaved people behind union lines

                But it got the ball rolling, now the union was in a more of a moral fight rather than just trying to keep the union together. Even though the win was small and nowhere need what needed it started shifting how the Union had to appear to itself and to other countries. It eventually ended up leading to the 13th, 14th, and 15th ammendments


                It’s easy to find fault in anything. It’s much harder to build that change. I encourage you to find some route to change that’s productive and build something with it

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  A lot of activists put work to make those changes. I am defending the activists and people who put the work in and got wins that no one acknowledges

                  No, you’re defending Biden.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because we didn’t elect enough of them. You’re really leaning on “we have a majority because West Virginia”?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Because we didn’t elect enough of them.

              There are never enough. They killed the public option last time we gave them a supermajority.