• Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago
    1. It’s morally good when people access information, culture, and entertainment.
    2. It’s morally good when the author of a work gets rewarded by their work.

    Piracy is morally justified when 1 is a more pressing matter than 2. As such, it’s justified in situations like this:

    • If, in the absence of piracy, the pirate would still not pay for the goods - because #2 is set up to zero (the author of the work is not rewarded anyway).
    • If it’s impossible to obtain the goods without piracy. For example, abandonware.
    • If the author of the work would get breadcrumbs of the money used to access legally the goods, and the pirate compensates the author directly (e.g. donation).
  • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I am not stealing. It’s there, I take it and it’s still there. Don’t know why these posts keep popping up in piracy communities. Same plague was there on reddit too. Like seriously it’s 2025.

  • mogranja@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I want the stuff, the stuff is there. I take it. The stuff is still there, nothing was lost, nothing was stolen.

    • Celestus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      You’re not stealing stuff, you’re stealing revenue. The missing revenue is what they care about. But they have plenty of that already, so they can get bent

      • corvus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Stealing revenue it’s hypothetical, because it supposes that you were going to pay for the product if it wasn’t available pirated. And that is far from being certain.

        • Celestus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          That is very true, but that doesn’t stop them from going after piracy to protect the revenue

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Not really, it’s just free publicity.

        Unless their product is shit, of course, and no one would pay for it after trying or recommend it to others… in which case, fuck them, they deserve it for attempting to sell shit.

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Everyone has already given their response so there’s nothing really to add other than, well, there’s lots of reasons to justify piracy. Most of them are even provided by the publishers / distributors themselves!

    Also it’s weird to browse the top 10 responses or even below, and NOT see this xkcd posted or even linked. What is going on, Lemmy?

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Usability and user experience. I’ve been on irc, newsgroups, dc++, etc etc. hell i traded d2 items for game keys on d2jsp.

    Why? Convenient as fuck. From my perspective, fuck anyone who is gonna tell me how to consume media. Give me a better experience than i can give myself or fuck off. I’ll give my money happily (i have subscriptions) if it’s a good service. If it’s the only service, meh AND if it sucks ass well, fuck off again.

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I bought a quite expensive piece of animation software (that cost over $1000) to use professionally. The specific term it was sold to me under was a “perpetual license.” I took this to mean “never ending”, which is the dictionary definition of the word “perpetual.” You can probably guess where this is going.

    A few years later, in the middle of a professional project, it stopped working. I contacted support, and was told that they changed the way they were doing licenses so I’d have to buy a new one (at almost double the price) or eat shit. I’m paraphrasing, but that was the gist of it.

    So yeah, if you’re thinking of buying a Toon Boom Harmony perpetual license, maybe save yourself a lot of money and hassle and just pirate it instead. Or tell them to get fucked and use their direct competitor. I have done both.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I am pro-piracy and I actually think that’s clearly a worse question.

      Did you take something that was intended to be sold or only given with explicit permission without permission or payment? Yes? Piracy. To be clear this is completely separate from the ethical questions that surround that, but defining piracy is (generally. GENERALLY, for emphasis) not that difficult.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah.

    For example, does Microsoft deserve my money for how much of a dumping they’ve taken onto Windows since Windows 8? No, they don’t.

    Because if I did give Microsoft my money, I’m REWARDING them for their half-assery.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Huh. Based on the community this was posted in, I can assume that the answer the video comes to is “yes” and not watch it. But according to Betteridge’s law of headlines the answer is “no.” I need to argue about this without watching it but I don’t know what stance to argue about.

    Ah! I’ll use the Orbit plugin to get an AI to summarize the video for me. Hm. The AI-generated summary says the video describes an anecdote about music copyright violations, talks about some ethical considerations about both music and software piracy, and then:

    The speaker concludes by acknowledging the complexity of the issue and the importance of considering the perspectives of all parties involved.

    So I guess the answer was “Maybe?” How am I supposed to have a pointless Internet argument about “Maybe?”

    Bah. Someone attack me for using AI, at least that’s a debate I can sink my teeth into.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Lazy prick! Should have just put the video on in the background while doing dishes, or do what I did and briefly skim the comments for someone to fight with! AI is dumb, it’s not even named effectively and you’re dumb for using it and a sheeple for calling it AI in the first place!
      Fight me! ❤️

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Joke’s on you, I have a dishwasher machine! Robots do my dishes for me too! It is you who is the dumb one, having to labor manually as you do!

        Ah, there we go. Thanks.