• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    the problem is that it is controlled by an adversary

    As opposed to billionaires working with the trump admin…

    If you don’t think this is adversarial government, I won’t try to convince you, it’ll keep getting more and more obvious

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You won’t find me supporting Twitter or Meta, and I won’t deny that their owners do seem to be influenced by foreign governments (directly or indirectly), but TikTok is clearly information Domain Warfare and it would be hell of a stupid to continue allowing it if they are still controlled by Chinese government. This is why that sale is for.

      https://youtu.be/9JQLaf4QaOs?t=6m51s

      If TikTok wasn’t a weapon, wouldn’t it make more sense to sell it and get something than not selling it and have nothing?

      The current behavior only makes sense if the real value was being China’s propaganda piece. A normal business would just go after money.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You think the French nobility fund d US revolutionaries because they were upset about taxes?

        If a country is doing something in another country, it’s for selfish reasons 99% of the time.

        If China wants to allow a place for people to complain about trump not controlled by a billionaire in Trump’s side…

        What they get out of it isn’t the primary concern. It’s helping the American people even if only done to fuck with Trump’s administration