With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?


Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

  • Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s been discussed to death, check the most recent thread about Scholz’s comment on !worldnews@lemmy.ml if you want to read through all of the discussion AGAIN.

    But you are right. I’m not willing to have a discussion about it with you. Just like I wouldn’t want to have a discussion about astronomy with a flat earther.

    Your “nuclear = support russia” comment made it very clear where you stand on the issue and on what basis. So discussion is entirly pointless.

    But it wasn’t really meant as a personal attack against you, if that comforts you. It’s a systematic problem, just like my other comparisons.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what was that Scholz’s comment thread again? The community doesn’t list anything from Scholz for me.

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germany was importing most of its uranium from Kazachstan through Russia. Even during the war and sanctions on other energy ressources taking effect, uranium was shipped, so the plants could keep running. Making our energy dependent on Russia, or trying to keep up the dependency, be it gas or uranium is heavily peddled by pro Putin shills. Funnily those are also often anti vaxxers and other consipracy theorists thanks to russian disinformation. So yes, peddling for more nuclear power remains peddling for Putin.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or you could just make deals with Canada or Australia instead.

        The Russian supply problem is a very badly made up stawman if you think about it for more than 15 seconds.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, the Canadians just clap twice and the mines put out triple the Uranium they did before. It doesnt take years to expand mines or anything. Also the other sources in Niger or Mali are not at risk of needing replacement, since the region is super stable… Oh wait shit, that supply is also at risk since there was a coup in Niger just 6 weeks ago.