Two escaped dogs savaged a flock of pregnant sheep, killing 22 and injuring another 48, before the out-of-control American XL bulldogs were shot. A farmer turned his gun on the pair of escaped animals that subjected his livestock to a brutal attack on a Welsh farm.

The financial cost of the incident, including the numerous deaths and injuries, amounted to more than £14,000.

The owner of the two dogs – David Hughes, 26, of Pen y Wern, Rhosllanerchrugog – appeared at Wrexham Magistrates’ Court where he admitted being in charge of a dog dangerously out of control and being the owner of a dog worrying livestock. Hughes was banned from keeping dogs for five years and ordered to pay £900 in fines.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “It’s a problem with the owner and not the dog.”

      We really need to update or replace the Dangerous Dogs Act, both expanding the banned breeds and giving larger penalties having them.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was confused why you wrote this about bulldogs at first. As this is what I’m pretty sure all Americans think of bulldogs.

      https://cdn-prd.content.metamorphosis.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/01/shutterstock_607907102-1-768x512.jpg

      Short cuddley little guys who just love to be couch potatoes and slobber everywhere.

      Then I realized this article is talking about pitbulls…never heard them called American xl bulldogs, always just pitbulls.

      Learn something everyday.

      • tal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d never heard the term either here in the US.

        Apparently a “bully” is a pitbull/bulldog cross, and XL is a larger variety.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah they do not look anything like what I expected them to be, definitely pitbulls and this doesn’t surprise me in the least that they killed sheep. They’re just dangerous dogs.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there is demand for it. Ban this breed and the demand does not go away, it will just switch to a new breed that isn’t banned as its done before.

      The way that they define dog breeds on the list is pretty shit as well, especially when a simple cross breed can circumvent it (have a look at how many pittie crosses can be picked up from dog rehoming centres) and the police don’t get involved until the dogs already gone too far.

      License the breeders, sell only neutered and chipped dogs unless to another licensed breeders, and make the breeders responsible for the dog to match an agreed healthy standard for the breed with aggressive and unhealthy breeds being bred out of existence.

      Sure, there will always be unlicensed breeders but use big fines to enable the RSPCA and vets to actually enforce it. Granted it will take up to 15 years from implementation to really kick in but just adding yet another dog to the list is just not working.

      • norbert@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        (22 + 48) * 250 = £17500 ($22,091) is roughly the cost of the sheep, that’s not calculating time/food cost put into the flock already, some were pregnant. Likely a total loss for the farmer, dog owner is a scumbag, ban bully breeds IMO.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article states £14000

          Generally those kind of valuations are calculated on cost of 1:1 replacement.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if thats more of an insurance thing? Like the farmer would claim and the insurance company goes after the dog owner for the money

      • StudioLE@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then farmer gets stiffed with increased insurance premiums. I really hope that’s not how it works.

        Hopefully the farmer can directly sue the owner for actual and emotional damages with Farm insurance covering the legal costs.

  • SbisasCostlyTurnover@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know it’s not really related to this news, but there’s a family at school who bring their XL down to the school gates at pickup and dropoff and every single time I see it I worry what it could do to the kids if it ever decided to go off. The dog owner wouldn’t stand a chance, it’s built like a [sturdy outdoor toilet made of bricks] and would probably just drag her along.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t imagine how much force these dogs can exert on the lead when they want to bolt, even my mates Shitzu can get some going when he wants to pull and these are ten times the size.

  • FatLegTed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless he gets compensation (this year, not £10 a week), this farmer could well go out of business. There need to be serious change in the licensing and enforcing.

    Imagine those two dogs in a school playground.

    Hughes needs to be banned from ever having a dog, 10 years jail and every thing he owns (and future wages/benefits garnished if necessary) sold to compensate for the loss of this farmer’s livelihood.