• ChiefGyk3D@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    My understanding is that DeepSeek still used Nvidia just older models and way more efficiently, which was remarkable. I hope to tinker with the opensource stuff at least with a little Twitch chat bot for my streams I was already planning to do with OpenAI. Will be even more remarkable if I can run this locally.

    However this is embarassing to the western companies working on AI and especially with the $500B announcement of Stargate as it proves we don’t need as high end of an infrastructure to achieve the same results.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      500b of trust me Bros… To shake down US taxpayer for subsidies

      Read between the lines folks

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s really not. This is the ai equivalent of the vc repurposing usa bombs that didn’t explode when dropped.

      Their model is the differentiator here but they had to figure out something more efficient in order to overcome the hardware shortcomings.

      The us companies will soon outpace this by duping the model and running it on faster hw

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Throw more hardware and power at it. Build more power plants so we can use AI.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      My understanding is that DeepSeek still used Nvidia just older models

      That’s the funniest part here, the sell off makes no sense. So what if some companies are better at utilizing AI than others, it all runs in the same hardware. Why sell stock in the hardware company? (Besides the separate issue of it being totally overvalued at the moment)

      This would be kind of like if a study showed that American pilots were more skilled than European pilots, so investors sold stock in airbus… Either way, the pilots still need planes to fly…

      • bobalot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Perhaps the stocks were massively overvalued and any negative news was going to start this sell off regardless of its actual impact?

        That is my theory anyway.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, but if they already have lots of planes, they don’t need to keep buying more planes. Especially if their current planes can now run for longer.

        AI is not going away but it will require less computing power and less capital investment. Not entirely unexpected as a trend, but this was a rapid jump that will catch some off guard. So capital will be reallocated.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ok, we’ll let’s keep the plane analogy. If they could run on 50% less fuel, would you invest in airline fuel companies, thinking they will be having bumper sales figures?