cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25112863

Source unknown, some sites assign it to Oppressive Silence comics by Ethan Vincent. But that website in the corner is shady

  • dudinax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    The first part of your comment doesn’t justify the second part. But it also isn’t true that it rarely happens randomly. It rarely happens randomly in high-ranked games. Bad rules like stalemate have a much stronger effect on low ranked games, which is what most people play.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Stalemates and forcing draws are pretty important imo as someone who dosen’t play and only watch. It’s gave the game a twist that let the losing player a way to fight back from a loosing position to a draw (that feels like a win).

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I can understand that if you don’t play the fucking game you don’t mind the trapped safe king.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        They are an important part of the game, but they aren’t a good twist. If you got rid of stalemate, then the losing player would just resign. Nothing wrong with that in a game that’s effectively over.

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      The first part of my comment entirely justifies the second part. It’s a strategy a skilled player currently losing can use to avoid the loss, not a fluke. And no, it also doesn’t randomly happen on low ranked games unless by low ranked you mean “absolute beginners who didn’t even know about the rule”.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        There’s a whole level of players who simply weren’t thinking about stalemate at the moment. They know the rule, they just weren’t thinking. Trapping the king so he can’t move and nothing can be done should be a win.

        • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          It shouldn’t. The whole point of a check mate is that the king will inevitably be captured. If you’re in no position to capture the king, then you can’t win.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            That’s only true because Kings can’t move into check. This is an unnecessary rule that, like stalemate, makes little difference to high level players, but is a bad rule for low level players.

              • dudinax@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                You’d call most people who play chess “absolute beginners”. Most people would hang their king if they could and would never remember the stalemate rule until it was too late.