• Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Can someone explain to me how being a leaseholder is different than being a renter (I’m an American)?

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Its technically the same as renting, but there’s a lot of stupid historical reasons that make it awkward. You could be a leaseholder with a 1000 year contract costing a few pennies per year. Which makes you, for all intents and purposes, an owner of the property.

    • HexagonSun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Leasehold is basically buying a property without actually truly owning it.

      You “buy” a flat, but you’re actually only buying the lease to live there. Not that any single person ever lives long enough for this to happen, but technically if you lived there 99 years it would then revert to belonging to the freeholder and you’d be left with nothing.

      In reality, anything below 80 years is seen as problematic and you have to renew the lease before then, at great cost.

      If a lease does fall below 80 years, the costs for renewal get increasingly absurd.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So is the "common hold " they talk about more like the condominiums we have here in the u.s. eg. You own your unit, and you pay an HOA or some organization for building maintenance and amenities?

  • ns1@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Good to see, but a shame that the plans only apply to new housing developments, and they’re being very vague about anything after that. Seems to take an extremely long time to do anything on this issue despite the changes apparently having wide support

  • solarpunkandrobots@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Far beyond time for this to be in the bin, I think there is one other country in the world that allows it. Hopefully the day will come when renters are placed on the same footing too, even if its clearly not going to be any time soon.

    Also on Groves reforms just happening to include ways for landowners to undermine the entire system while superficially looking good, thats not some accident.

  • Weslee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s good sure, but if only they put so much work into reforming fptp voting…

    • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      There was a vote in 2011 to change the voting system that the idiots of the UK voted against changing. I was a kid then and that was the first time I voted but even as someone who has almost zero interest in politics I could see that moving away from fptp was the (what I thought) obvious choice.

      Apparently not.

      After the absolute farce that was brexit as well I don’t believe the the population of the UK are able to make a good decision that benefits the country and general populace. The majority of the population aren’t able to employ critical thinking and are just easily lead towards shitty decisions.

      I don’t believe that even if we did get another vote to change this terrible system that it would actually pass unfortunately. I have no faith in the ability of this population to make good decisions.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The majority of the population aren’t able to employ critical thinking and are just easily lead towards shitty decisions.

        But… but… democracy!

        /s

      • thisismyname@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The problem with that referendum was that unless you can confidently and clearly explain why a change is better than the status quo then people tend to stick with what they know.

        The offer in that vote didn’t clearly show an improvement to FPTP. The question wasn’t “should we enact proportional representation or not?”. The question wasn’t “Of these five voting systems which would you prefer?”

        The question was “At present, the UK uses the “first past the post” system to elect MPs to the House of Commons. Should the “alternative vote” system be used instead?”

        The alternative vote system doesn’t really have any obviously huge advantages over FPTP. It doesn’t offer proportional representation.

        This short video explains it well:

        https://youtu.be/3Y3jE3B8HsE

        Obviously, any improvement is better than no improvement but people tend not to like change so you have to very clearly state what they will gain from changing. And that didn’t happen.

        This playlist has a few videos explaining voting systems if you’d like to learn more:

        https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqs5ohhass_RN57KWlJKLOc5xdD9_ktRg

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          That and it was the Brexit pre-cursor.

          Would you like this dying child to get a ventilator, or an alternative voting system?

          Turns out, you’ll have neither.