• kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not original work. The reason he can do that to Starfield but not, say, Bully Scholarship Edition is because the work was done for him on Starfield: the engine already provides the data.

    Replacements from FSR 2 to DLSS are not uncommon, not new, and not special. They require very little work.

    There is indeed a tiny nugget of original code there, but it’s absolutely useless without the actual DLSS tech and the actual engine doing the work.

    • beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Knowing how to do the work is most of the value here. Yes, it’s easy for those of us with the knowhow, but most people do not have that.

      Think of an artist who can whip up a cool drawing in about 10 minutes. It was “easy” in the moment, but only because they spent years learning and practicing the skills to make it so. You aren’t entitled to that artists labor for free just because it only took them a few minutes.

      Sit your average gamer down with a copy of Starfield and nvngx_dlss.dll and they won’t be able to do anything useful with it.

      It’s great that most modders and some artists like to share their work for free with the rest of the world, but the rest of us aren’t entitled to any of it.

        • Nefrayu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You only have to pay for this mod once.

          An artist isn’t going to continue making modifications to a painting once you’ve bought it, not unless you pay them to do so. Presuming they aren’t feeling generous with their time.

      • Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still might choose to take a picture of my buddy’s cool drawing that he bought rather than buying my own copy. Though I agree that I am certainly not entitled to a free print at the author’s expense.

        Conversely, if I bought that drawing myself and it came with reflective glass glued to the front, so that pictures turned out blurry, I might be a little annoyed. Now I can’t roll it up and put it with my other drawings without special accommodations. Also, I bought it and if I want to take a picture of it or wipe my ass with it then that is my choice. Making the life of your customers more difficult so you can make a little extra money is going to lose you some of those customers.

        Not that I begrudge someone for making good money, but that dude said he is making $40k a month from his Patreon for DLSS3 mods. Does he really feel like he isn’t get paid what his time was worth, or is he just getting greedy in a community that is usually more aligned with FOSS concepts?

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, 90% of programming work now is “I got X library to work inside of Y new system in Z engine”. It makes sense too - it’s exceedingly rare that it makes sense to reinvent someone else’s wheel - and at times, not insignificant to implement the right hooks.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Things don’t need to be novel and amazing to be marketable. And if it’s that trivial, rather than pirating it people would just rewrite it. The fact that they’re stealing it means it has value.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that they’re stealing it means it’s priced above its perceived value though.

        • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So it has perceived value…

          But that guy above was saying that it’s worthless and trivial to implement…

          You can’t have it both ways.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not true at all. People often steal because they value the item but cannot afford the price.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        novel and amazing

        They don’t need to be, you’re right. They should be more than a third party’s DLL file though.

        people would just rewrite it

        They did in less than 24 hours.

        it has value

        DLSS is got a lot of value, people want that into their games. If that’s using two lines of code from modder X or Y is irrelevant.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Strange how they felt the need to pirate his non-work instead of just doing it themselves?

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering there are 3 alternative versions, free, made in less than 24 hours, looks like people made it themselves.

        But alas, commenting without a 10 second search is a good idea indeed.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no need to do a search. People are paying for this product. Meaning they couldn’t find it elsewhere.