Mozilla released their studies, and I’m seeing a growing number of posts on the Internet about cars and the privacy nightmare they entail. I remember how this issue wasn’t talked about earlier because “just buy an older car” was still prevalent. I’m so happy that people are taking notice. Thank you to this community and Mozilla for the work they are putting in!

  • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m basically in the position that I’m driving a car from 1999, and when it finally dies, I’ll either be resigned to riding the bus or finding another aged used car without all this absolute bullshit in it.

    • 50MYT@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t need a very old car, just one that is old enough the cellular network doesn’t work any more.

      Some vehicles were made for 3g, and can’t go to 4g for example.

      • BruceLee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        2g antenna sare still up and running. Every new generation is add on top of the previous like a new layer of the network. And telemetry can be collected through older gen network.

          • BruceLee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            TIL. But why would you do that ? Ain’t it more convenient to keep every gen ?

            • LinusSexTips@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              We’re a bit mad out here, we turned off CDMA in favour of 3G. The 3G system our main telco implemented was built for England and didn’t have amps built into the specifications.

              Every site that was rolled out in regional areas needed to be attended to and upgraded with amplifiers (I know as I was one of such techs) doing heaps more work during the changeover period.

              I believe the main reason is to reduce the volume of channels being broadcast on, to free up for other services (our analogue TV is turned off too).

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it really is time for the Free Open Source Vehicle.

      Sure, but what it is for certain time for is making this sort of spying and tracking illegal. If I as a private citizen tracked someone this much, it would be considered stalking, which is a criminal offense.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Getting a base model can somewhat help too. My 2020 car only has carplay. No built in navigation or any remote or homing tech (that I know of). It’s the higher trims that get all the fancy tech “features”.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh my god, no. No, no, no.

        Just because they aren’t making those features available to you doesn’t mean they aren’t still tracking all that stuff.

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean sort of. What is “base” has also changed.

        Try finding an EV that doesn’t have automatic windows but has old school manual rollup/rolldown windows. You can’t, even though its more environmentally friendly.

        • Limeey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m sorry but roll windows are awful and I’ve personally seen people nearly get in accidents because they’re focused on rolling the window instead of the road.

          I am willing to bet A LOT that the energy consumption of the small window servo is trivial on the ev’s battery and is a worthwhile expenditure so that the already incompetent drivers aren’t engaging in a physical task while driving down the highway.

          • BruceLee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Before every car had electrical windows, they was car with electric for the front seats but not the back. It’s a nice compromise.

          • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve definitely fiddled more on finding the damn switch to roll the windows than manually rolling them down. Goddamn switch is always in a different place.

          • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean, that has a lot more to do with trying to multitask on the freeway than it does the windows. I’ve seen people fiddling with their phones or the touchscreens in their car just as badly.

            That’s an issue of an unwillingness to plan ahead and focus on driving, not the windows themselves.

            I’m definitely not a fan of treating everyone like a baby who needs coddling because some people can’t be fucked to do better. Aww poor babies need power windows so they can drive without distraction!

            Telling me I can’t have manual roll windows because some people are fucking idiots is a joke.

            When someone slams their car into mine on the freeway because they were dicking around with their phone, I’ll make sure to blame the phone for existing.

            • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you can’t roll up a window and drive in a straight line on the freeway, then you shouldn’t have a driver’s license.

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yikes. So according to you, I can know if I’m going to be hot or cold at any given time and just need to plan for it. Weird, stupid, false. 1) the power needed to roll a window up/down is practically nil and 2) distractions happen, stop being so goddamned high and mighty. This is a dumbass argument that has nothing to do with people texting or any of this other shit you’re trying to equate to it.

            • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The extraction and refining of the copper ore needed for the motor, which has brushes (so a finite lifespan) but is also sealed without any way to replace those brushes (not to mention the hassle of getting into the door . I don’t think I’ve ever done it, on dozens and dozens of doors, without breaking clips), so they’re manufactured essentially as a throw away item, the opposite of sustainability.

              Manual windows are easy, take no thought and if the window falls off track, you just get into the door and bend the track back into shape. Anyone can do it. You just got to open it up, roll it up and down a couple times to understand how it works and literally anyone can figure out their fix then. And at a cost of a few door clips, not an EXTREMELY overpriced $100+ for a 12v motor.

              I don’t like buying guaranteed points of failure in my purchases when I don’t have too, that’s all I’m saying.

              • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                So say it to the guy who is arguing that? I’ve had two responses to my post act like I’m arguing for power windows when I’m aruing against them. I don’t understand why I’m getting downvoted while I have two people who have been upvoted who fucking agree with me.

            • Limeey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is a stupid take. You’re telling me that you expect car manufacturers incorporate manufacturing techniques that apply to your small niche that is also demonstrably less safe? And for what, “Privacy” reasons?

        • Rev3rze@lemdit.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With a button you just press it to close the windows for a short stint of faster driving where having the windows down is uncomfortable. With a flange you’d probably be more inclined to leave them open because of the effort required to close them while driving. I think having your windows open even for a few short drives leads to more energy usage by increased drag than the window servo uses in the whole cars’ lifetime. So I don’t think it is any more environmentally friendly.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That community completely ignores reality for millions billions of people that absolutely need a car to live a life in the thousands of cities that don’t have adequate public transportation and 100% of the rural areas in the world.

        • BruceLee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are fighting for better transportations for them so, I don’t think they ignore them. They are very aware of them and very keen on improving their lives conditions.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Multiple billions no. There’s 1.4 billion cars after a casual google, and considering how many people have cars as a convenience or multiple cars I think it might be closer to a single billion people need cars.

    • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s kinda extreme lol but I hope that companies start selling non smart cars. I don’t want my car to be smart , I want my car to take me to point A and B , and be able to fix it myself.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ll probably just fix up my GS500 and run that until petrol is outlawed. Possibly the last fully mechanical motor vehicle ever sold.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get what you’re trying to say but gas engines are inherently electrical. That’s how they generate the spark.

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My city doesn’t even have bus fare. It’s not like they’re grabbing my biometrics when I step in. They’re not trying to identify me when I walk on.

        You just walk on, wait, then walk off.

        It may not be the most private way of transport but it’s not actively collecting data on you, which is what this is about.

        EDIT: Further, it’s just easier for a car to collect data on it’s owner. When you buy a car, you get a Title which registers the Vehicle Identification Number to the owners name. Then, when you’re driving, because you’re in public you’re required to have your Drivers License, Registration, Insurance, a License Plate and up-to-date Tabs all very specific identifiers that identify both the driver and the car. The cars sensors only have to identify the owner, to whom it is already registered, and so they know the data they’re collecting is from one person/one family.

        I’ve seen my cities bus budget. They have cameras on the bus for the protection of drivers but can barely afford them. They’re definitely not dumping money into shit like facial recognition. I don’t even need an ID to ride the bus. I can walk on with empty pockets and no one is gonna tell me I can’t ride the bus without ID. If you drive without your license, you can get it taken away.

          • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good points, and I’m sorry to hear that’s happening in your area man.

            If your city doesn’t already do this, they will soon.

            I mean… I just explained why my city did away with fares entirely, so I don’t know about that.

              • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Which is absolutely a fair take, it’s definitely happening in places, just thankfully not everywhere. Hopefully talking about it can lead more people to get involved in local politics and try to fight implementation of such systems. Thanks for informing me.

        • hackris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          May I ask which city (or at least country)? The no bus fares part is intriguing :)

          • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            US, Northwest. The fares only accounted for about 2% of the total budget for transit, and the city was looking into upgrading their fare-collector devices because the ones they had were getting really old and starting to fail. After they did the math, they realized it would cost them more to get the new fare-collectors bought and installed than it would to… just get rid of the fare collectors altogether. It was simply going to cost so much money that they would have had to increase fares to pay for it, and so they just said “screw it” and dropped fares entirely.