AI-generated child sex imagery has every US attorney general calling for action::“A race against time to protect the children of our country from the dangers of AI.”

  • ram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Psychologists.

    There’s no evidence that CSAM, real or virtual, helps reduce rates of child predation.

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        (it’s not)

        I’d love if you could cite your evidence.

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I never said I had evidence. I specifically said there was no evidence. The claim presented is that it’s beneficial, and thte burden of proof lies with the claim.

        • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          And what if CG porn is that help

          That’s not claiming it is benefical. It’s entertaining the idea that what if it is.

          • ram@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then that can be decided by psychologists. It’s funny you keep insisting on calling it “CG porn” though when it’s abjectly and legally child pornography.