You heard him 4090 users, upgrade to a more powerful GPU.

  • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Textures are larger, where 4k was just getting rolling in 2017 (pre RDR2 after all), to accomodate 4K textures had to be scaled up (and remember width and height, so that’s 4x the memory and 4x the space on drive)

    Texture resolution has not considerably effected performance since the 90s.

    Changing graphics settings in this game barely effects performance anyway.

    Things like anti-aliasing for example, they’re always something like 8x, but that’s 8x the resolution, which the resolutions have only gone up, again rising with time.

    Wtf are you talking about, nobody uses SSAA these days. TAA has basically no performance penalty and FSR has a performance improvement when used.

    If you’re going to try and argue this point at least understand what’s going on.

    The game is not doing anything that other games haven’t achieved in a more performant way. They have created a teetering mess of a game that barely runs.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Texture resolution has not considerably effected performance since the 90s.

      If this were true there wouldn’t be low resolution textures at lower settings, high resolutions take up exponentially more space, memory, and time to compute. I’m definitely not going to be re-learning what I know about games from Edgelord here.

          • regbin_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Only if you run out of VRAM. If there’s sufficient VRAM the frame rate barely changes between Lowest and Highest texture quality.