• flipht@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    No one will convince me he isn’t doing this on purpose to tank the brand.

    He and his buddies were mad that they couldn’t compete. So he made the offer in a manic moment, and then was forced to go through with it. Now that he’s got it, he’s going to destroy it, and use the loss to reduce his taxes from all his government contracts.

    And he simultaneously gets to platform fascists and silence people calling out the powerful. Wins all around.

    For a normal person, this looks like failing. I totally get that. But rich people can derive massive benefits from stuff that would ruin us, and every single thing Musk is doing benefits him in some way.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This phrase doesn’t really work if someone is trying to be malicious in the first place. I usually see it used when someone’s intentions were good but they were just stupid about it. That’s not really the case here

        It’s possible that Elon tried to do something malicious, and failed because of stupid choices. It’s also true that the outcome also benefits him.

        I will attribute it to malice regardless

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        That assumes all things are equal.

        They rely on you repeating this adage to get away with this shit. It’s too consistent. If he were actually stupid, he’d face negative consequences, which is something these folks very rarely have to do.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s assigning a level of intelligence to Elon that I’m not comfortable with. Plus I’m sure he and his buddies are getting some value out of killing Twitter, but certainly not 44 billion.

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        He does not have to do it himself. He has accountants and lawyers who can take his stupid decisions and turn them into money.

        At a certain point the economies of scale of being a billionaire just keep you rich. What I’ve said is pretty standard tax bullshit that they grow up pulling.

        • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          just spitballing here, but what happens if accountants band together and tell him to do his own damn taxes? he’s fucked then, isn’t he? the real revolution of the future won’t be fought in the streets, but in the accounting departments /s

          • flipht@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            I mean, you’re kind of seeing this with Donald Trump’s legal issues. He can’t get anyone with real clout, so he’s actually facing consequences in that arena now.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Since Elmo isn’t playing with his own money, the investors and banks who gave him that money are going to be mad if all he did is run the company into the ground.

      He got like 13 billion from banks.

      Only a small part came from his own Tesla stocks.