• BatmanAoD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the point of the “BIG_GLOBAL_STATIC…” name is that global statics are bad, not that the syntax is ugly. That said, you’re absolutely correct that combining channels with async code is the way to go.

    • BB_C@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the point of the “BIG_GLOBAL_STATIC…” name is that global statics are bad, not that the syntax is ugly.

      Yes. And my point was that there is an obvious way of sharing data besides passing static-refs, cloning, and using Arcs, which is moving data bidirectionally. That was conveniently, or ignorantly, glossed over by the coping gopher.