She’s almost 70, spend all day watching q-anon style of videos (but in Spanish) and every day she’s anguished about something new, last week was asking us to start digging a nuclear shelter because Russia was dropped a nuclear bomb over Ukraine. Before that she was begging us to install reinforced doors because the indigenous population were about to invade the cities and kill everyone with poisonous arrows. I have access to her YouTube account and I’m trying to unsubscribe and report the videos, but the reccomended videos keep feeding her more crazy shit.

  • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a bit disturbed how people’s beliefs are literally shaped by an algorithm. Now I’m scared to watch Youtube because I might be inadvertently watching propaganda.

    • clobubba@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is what bothers me most about the “I have nothing to hide” crowd. With enough data about you, it’s a lot easier to manipulate you.

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s even worse than “a lot easier”. Ever since the advances in ML went public, with things like Midjourney and ChatGPT, I’ve realized that the ML models are way way better at doing their thing that I’ve though.

        Midjourney model’s purpose is so receive text, and give out an picture. And it’s really good at that, even though the dataset wasn’t really that large. Same with ChatGPT.

        Now, Meta has (EDIT: just a speculation, but I’m 95% sure they do) a model which receives all data they have about the user (which is A LOT), and returns what post to show to him and in what order, to maximize his time on Facebook. And it was trained for years on a live dataset of 3 billion people interacting daily with the site. That’s a wet dream for any ML model. Imagine what it would be capable of even if it was only as good as ChatGPT at doing it’s task - and it had uncomparably better dataset and learning opportunities.

        I’m really worried for the future in this regard, because it’s only a matter of time when someone with power decides that the model should not only keep people on the platform, but also to make them vote for X. And there is nothing you can do to defend against it, other than never interacting with anything with curated content, such as Google search, YT or anything Meta - because even if you know that there’s a model trying to manipulate with you, the model knows - there’s a lot of people like that. And he’s already learning and trying how to manipulate even with people like that. After all, it has 3 billion people as test subjects.

        That’s why I’m extremely focused on privacy and about my data - not that I have something to hide, but I take a really really great issue with someone using such data to train models like that.

        • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just to let you know, meta has an open source model, llama, and it’s basically state of the art for open source community, but it falls short of chatgpt4.

          The nice thing about the llama branches (vicuna and wizardlm) is that you can run them locally with about 80% of chatgpt3.5 efficiency, so no one is tracking your searches/conversations.

    • nLuLukna @sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reason and critical thinking is all the more important in this day and age. It’s just no longer taught in schools. Some simple key skills like noticing fallacies or analogous reasoning, and you will find that your view on life is far more grounded and harder to shift

  • fennec@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point I would set up a new account for her - I’ve found Youtube’s algorithm to be very… persistent.

      • ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can make “brand accounts” on YouTube that are a completely different profile from the default account. She probably won’t notice if you make one and switch her to it.

        You’ll probably want to spend some time using it for yourself secretly to curate the kind of non-radical content she’ll want to see, and also set an identical profile picture on it so she doesn’t notice. I would spend at least a week “breaking it in.”

        But once you’ve done that, you can probably switch to the brand account without logging her out of her Google account.

  • fuser@quex.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    the damage that corporate social media has inflicted on our social fabric and political discourse is beyond anything we could have imagined.

  • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Log in as her on your device. Delete the history, turn off ad personalisation, unsubscribe and block dodgy stuff, like and subscribe healthier things, and this is the important part: keep coming back regularly to tell YouTube you don’t like any suggested videos that are down the qanon path/remove dodgy watched videos from her history.

    Also, subscribe and interact with things she’ll like - cute pets, crafts, knitting, whatever she’s likely to watch more of. You can’t just block and report, you’ve gotta retrain the algorithm.

  • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Delete all watched history. It will give her a whole new sets of videos. Like a new algorithms.

    Where does she watch he YouTube videos? If it’s a computer and you’re a little techie, switch to Firefox then change the user agent to Nintendo Switch. I find that YouTube serve less crazy videos for Nintendo Switch.

  • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can go into the view history and remove all the bad videos.

    My mom has a similar problem with animal videos. She likes watching farm videos where sometimes there’s animals giving birth… And those videos completely ruin the algorithm. After that she only gets animals having sex, and the animal fighting and killing eachother.

  • Andreas@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s sad how so many of the comments are sharing strategies about how to game the Youtube algorithm, instead of suggesting ways to avoid interacting with the algorithm at all, and learning to curate content on your own.

    The algorithm doesn’t actually care that it’s promoting right-wing or crazy conspiracy content, it promotes whatever that keeps people’s eyeballs on Youtube. The fact is that this will always be the most enraging content. Using “not interested” and “block this channel” buttons doesn’t make the algorithm stop trying to advertise this content, you’re teaching it to improve its strategy to manipulate you!

    The long-term strategy is to get people away from engagement algorithms. Introduce OP’s mother to a patched Youtube client that blocks ads and algorithmic feeds (Revanced has this). “Youtube with no ads!” is an easy way to convince non-technical people. Help her subscribe to safe channels and monitor what she watches.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not everyone is willing to switch platforms that easily. You can’t always be idealistic.

      • Andreas@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why I suggested Revanced with “disable recommendations” patches. It’s still Youtube and there is no new platform to learn.