Anti-trans organizations have said that their position against gender affirming care center on “protecting kids.” Now, a Florida judge has allowed them to proceed with their next target: trans adults.
Several weeks ago, a federal judge in Florida halted a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, declaring it likely unconstitutional. Yet, transgender adults were also heavily impacted by the law: 80% of gender-affirming care providers for trans adults in the state were forced to stop. Consequently, many found themselves forced to flee the state, temporarily or permanently, in order to access care. Those forced to stay clung to the hope that the provisions targeting them might also be overruled. However, those hopes suffered a setback when the 11th Circuit Court determined that discriminating against transgender individuals in healthcare would be allowed, at least in the short term. Relying on this verdict, the Florida Judge Monday declined to block the sections affecting trans adult care. Now, the precedent has been set for adult care bans, a stark contradiction to some anti-trans activists’ assurances that their sole aim was to “protect children.”
Earlier this year, Florida passed SB254. The bill did not only prohibit gender-affirming care for transgender youth, but also casted stringent requirements for care on trans adults. Specifically, the laws bars nurse practitioners from administering care and mandates that providers distribute inaccurate medical forms, laden with misleading narratives, suggesting treatments are experimental. This was a substantial change, as the vast amount of trans adult care is provided by nurse practitioners. A representative from a clinic in the state, SPEKTRUM Health, estimated that 80% of such care would be affected. Further, the new informed consent form dictates a pre-requisite of “social support” before a trans individual embarks on care, despite many trans adults losing social support from their families after they transition. Though the initial discussion centered on the effect of the bill on trans youth, trans adults across the state suddenly saw their prescriptions dropped by their providers as a result.
Can everyone just admit that the term ‘gender affirming care’ is used to obfuscate what the realities of constructing a neo-vagina actually entails?
They aren’t talking about getting a perm or going for a pedicure
Only if you admit that this is just a giant boogeyman to scare stupid people. More children under age 18 got boob jobs than all “gender-affirming care” that you’re against combined last year. That also doesn’t include other permanent body modifications like lip filler, vaginoplasty, butt implants, or the like. If you’re going to pretend it’s about “constructing a neo-vagina”, then you have to explain why your outrage only targets one specific demographic.
deleted by creator
i’ll take ‘i think gender is only about genitalia and not the social, physical, and societal constructs therein and need to pass my ignorance off comically’ for $100.
deleted by creator
well, actually people do have a problem with that. not sure where the fuck you’ve been.
that’s also not at all what this post or article* is about, especially since this article isn’t about children. there are other gender affirming surgeries that don’t have to do with genitals.
you don’t know what you’re taking about, and it doesn’t make sense to carry on pretending that you do.
deleted by creator