witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1227arrow-down199
arrow-up1128arrow-down1imageSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comwitchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-square⚡⚡⚡@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoSomeone wrote a comment under this: https://feddit.de/comment/2923637
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoDisturbing for having their slogan as, “the search engine that doesn’t know anything about you” I guess they meant, “doesn’t know anything about you… Yet”
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThey need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found. I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNo doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.
I’m wondering that, too.
Someone wrote a comment under this: https://feddit.de/comment/2923637
Disturbing for having their slogan as, “the search engine that doesn’t know anything about you”
I guess they meant, “doesn’t know anything about you… Yet”
They need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found.
I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
No doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.