• Then_I_said@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    I understand the controversy, especially in light of the recent Reddit bullshit. But I don’t think I understand the tech.

    For the sake of it, let’s focus only on games that are paid for, installed on a system (or downloaded using Game Pass), and do not involve a multiplayer element. (Hollow Knight, Cuphead, etc)

    Is there some ongoing resource use (on Unity’s end) when people download or play these games? Like, when I play Hollow Knight, my system isn’t connecting to Unity to use their servers to run the game on my home system, is it? When I download a game to my system, an I downloading the engine separately from the software, thereby using Unity’s servers?

    As abhorrent as the Reddit API change was, at least they were charging for the ongoing consumption of some digital resource (Reddit data). Unless I’m misunderstanding something, this just seems more like trying to collect a residual after the fact.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, there are no costs for Unity in this situation. The way they’ll need to track installs is with the unity runtime, which gets packaged with games made using Unity.

      This is what economists call “rent-seeking”, where companies seek to extract more profit by charging subscriptions, rather than introducing desirable products. Adobe, AutoCAD, Microsoft Office, and the Reddit API are all high profile examples of rent-seeking.

    • mihnt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is there some ongoing resource use (on Unity’s end)

      Nope. The engine is part of the game once compiled. So all hosting and bandwidth cost goes to steam/gog/whoever is selling the game.

      They are just trying to get more of that sweet viral game money.