Gogo Sempai@programming.dev to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 1 year agoWho'll be next?programming.devimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1571arrow-down117file-text
arrow-up1554arrow-down1imageWho'll be next?programming.devGogo Sempai@programming.dev to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 1 year agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up64arrow-down4·1 year agoI’m pretty sure gaming studios would be mostly fine with paying a percentage of the sales revenue to unity too, the problem is that Unity wants a flat fee even when studios aren’t making any money.
minus-squarePons_Aelius@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up87·1 year ago I’m pretty sure gaming studios would be mostly fine with paying a percentage of the sales revenue to unity too, I think the real problem is changing the terms of the agreement and making it retroactive.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoYes, the question is what will happen next year and the year after that. Pandora’s box has been opened.
minus-squarePons_Aelius@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoExactly. If they are willing to fuck over the creatives like this the best thing to do is to cut their losses and move to a different engine.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
I’m pretty sure gaming studios would be mostly fine with paying a percentage of the sales revenue to unity too, the problem is that Unity wants a flat fee even when studios aren’t making any money.
I think the real problem is changing the terms of the agreement and making it retroactive.
Yes, the question is what will happen next year and the year after that.
Pandora’s box has been opened.
Exactly. If they are willing to fuck over the creatives like this the best thing to do is to cut their losses and move to a different engine.
That is Unreal’s model.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]