• spitz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your post prompted me to have a look at Tildes. It looks alright, but a bit… dry.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Its not for everyone and that’s part of why its for me ;) Not that I’m elitist or anything, I just hate low-efforts and assholes, ne’r may the two meet here

      • spitz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes! Viva la difference! I like that there are a lot of options for everyone, I’d just like some more options that suited me.

    • Ashtear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It can be. Women or queer persons can potentially have a tough time there, too.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ya, that post was pretty wishsy-washy and sweeping, people can make their points without needing to resort to identity politics to give credibillity to non-credible or insufficient arguments they want to toss out there. From my experience, I could argue any point from whatever lens you can think of and I believe I could receive votes and recognition. I can even swear because the force of my argument will be sufficient to excuse any nominal crassness that I strategically use to intensify the reasonable claim I ultimately make from the relevant or hypothetical vantage point in question.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you elaborate or link me to some corroboration of that—it seemed remarkably progressive and reasonable in my limited experience