ElCanut@jlai.lu to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoWell yes, but actually nojlai.luimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1354arrow-down10
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imageWell yes, but actually nojlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarejormaig@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah, but RAE is not happy with this solution. 😅 I think at some point they’ll come with their own proposal. For now I think that they emphasize non-gendered language instead of converting gendered words to non-gendered.
Yeah, but RAE is not happy with this solution. 😅 I think at some point they’ll come with their own proposal. For now I think that they emphasize non-gendered language instead of converting gendered words to non-gendered.