• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are scenarios where this is reasonable. If cars are parked below housing units. The risk of fire from the electric battery that can’t be controlled, might be too great for their insurance carrier.

    • halvo317@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe if it were 2009 lol. EVs don’t randomly catch fire anymore. Even if it were true, with what Toronto landlords charge, they can afford an insurance bump.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean Canadian landlords. I pay more for a town house in London Ontario than most people in Toronto 😂. Canada is fucked.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The remaining fire risk/safety issues tend to be with dodgy cheap batteries used as replacements in ebikes and the like, and there are ways to mitigate even those risks (fireproof charging lockers, anyone?). Electric cars are much more heavily safety-tested, and I would say that at this point in their evolution they’re no more likely to catch fire spontaneously than an ICE car.

      Plus, some of those parking spaces are probably reserved for visitors, right? You think they’re going to go out and rent an ICE car just to visit this place? There will be EVs on the premises anyway, as they gain market share in general.