• pianoplant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t volunteer either piece of information, but sooner or later someone is going to overhear me ordering vegan food or see me opening my lunch and the dreaded conversation will have to happen. I wish people would just let me make my own food choices in private without making a big thing about it.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      But they feel attacked. They want to continue living in blissful ignorance of how animals are treated or how bad it is for the environment. Same as windows users who don’t want to be reminded what corporate cucks they are. Some even go so far as to become utter bootlickers (see also Elon Musk fanboys)

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I usually ask when someone eats any exotic cereals or processed (tofu, seitan) to 1 have something to talk about (I very much enjoy tofu and all uncommon cereals) 2 know their dietary restrictions to avoid offering them meat or taking care of that whenever there’s an outing. You know, small talk.

      • Fedora@lemmy.haigner.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        … or they’re curious. Schools these days educate people about animal treatment, but some people don’t really care that much, including myself.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What sucks is that you have to keep it for yourself, otherwise people will think negatively of you. Because for some reason caring about animals or the climate is cringe or something idk, like it’s something to almost be embarrassed about. Which is doubly strange when animal abuse is often considered very bad by those very same people.

      But I guess for many caring about other people in general is cringe as well, as long as they are sufficiently emotionally distanced, so ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ I just wish it wasn’t, and that caring for others was the baseline more than anything else.

    • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, the stereotype drives me nuts. Like, yes, food is a big part of day-to-day life and sometimes I need to explain when asked why I’m not eating if there’s nothing for me at, say, a company event. I try to avoid it as much as possible and just say I’m not hungry.

      • palordrolap@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Whatever the highest rank is.

        Arch- usually indicates the highest form possible without utter transcendence into a different form, or at least a, well, overarching rank of some sort. (Semantically related, but not etymologically, apparently. At least not directly. But I digress.)

        It is, after all, why the name of Arch Linux is what it is (so sayeth Wikipedia). The creator wanted it to be the best with no equal.

        An arch-vegan might be one best at not only avoiding animal-based produce but also convincing people to convert to veganism, as well as making normally well-adjusted vegans feel that they’re not being a good enough vegan.

  • Floey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s the arch user equivalent of getting asked if a fish is an animal?

    What’s the vegan equivalent of getting asked if you use PC or Mac?

    Vegan Arch user btw

    • Matombo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also people who use pc as a synonyme for windows. fuck those guys and guydedts.

      PS. Macs are also PCs as PC describes the hardware and the usecase unrelated to the producer and the installed os.

      • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        There’s a bit more subtlety to it than that. The PC architecture that dominates today is a direct descendant of the 1981 IBM Personal Computer, which was made to run DOS and later Wondows. The cultural association makes sense in that context.

      • probably@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Language changes over time and words don’t mean the same thing forever. The entire purpose of language is to communicate. So if you have a Mac and say you are a PC user, you are failing to use language well. Apple themselves helped facilitate that change. It can be less consistent with Linux on a PC, I agree. But language is an evolving meme (as per the original definition of meme, not the cat photos). And to not acknowledge that is like being a young earth creationist with language.

        Do you also argue that anyone who is happy is part of the LGBT community?

        • Matombo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          But PC has not made this transition universaly which makes it a very ambigues word. It is still used a category of electronic devices regardless auf operating system. Also if you say PC = Windows PC and MAC = MacOS PC what is the overarching Category? and ? = Linux PC?

    • Matombo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago
      1. Do you think Manjaro is Arch/an Arch derivative?

      2. But you still eat fish, right?