• Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Remember when Y2K was going to potentially end the world, but it didn’t thanks to experts working 'round the clock?

    Remember when corporations turned around and got pissy because Y2K was successfully avoided, claiming that it was all a big hoax?

    Remember how it’s now taught in some places that Y2K was a hoax and you can’t trust experts?

    No wonder the world struggled with COVID.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The reason Y2K wasn’t a big deal was through the efforts of software developers and the only recognition they got was the movie Office Space.

    • FuntyMcCraiger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It cost like half a trillion dollars to avert the issues of Y2K. A lot of people don’t realize how much of an issue it was.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. I can see the same thing happening with climate change; say we successfully avert it, you’ll have all the lunatics on saying, “see?? There was nothing to worry about, we stressed and struggled for nothing!!1!”

      • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s the one thing we can’t avert, only adapt to and mitigate. The time to avert was half a century earlier.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s too late to wish for that. We’ve already emitted too much, and didn’t slow enough in time to avert catastrophic climate change. We will likely live through it, but we’ll suffer. And those in poorer, hotter countries will die en masse. Wars will likely happen as refugees flee countries now made inhospitable. Fascism will rise as richer countries, more able to weather the storms, become insular and focus on domestic issues to the detriment of the aforementioned refugees. Perhaps revolutions will happen. Extreme heatwaves, hurricanes, tsunamis, will threaten coastal and tropical cities, and island nations in particular, but even cooler countries will be stricken with fatal heatwaves, just less often.

        None of this is “if” we miss some target. We already missed it. It is already set in stone. We can only do our best to ensure it doesn’t get even worse than that. That’s still not the worst possible outcome.

      • Sternout@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Damn we made the air breathable, the rivers clean and the animals happy for no reason

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Are you ready to go through it again soon?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem

      The year 2038 problem (also known as Y2038, Y2K38, Y2K38 superbug or the Epochalypse) is a time formatting bug in computer systems that represent times after the time 03:14:07 UTC on 19 January 2038.

      The problem exists in systems which measure Unix time – the number of seconds elapsed since the Unix epoch (00:00:00 UTC on 1 January 1970) – and store it in a signed 32-bit integer. The data type is only capable of representing integers between −(231) and 231 − 1, meaning the latest time that can be properly encoded is 231 − 1 seconds after epoch (03:14:07 UTC on 19 January 2038). Attempting to increment to the following second (03:14:08) will cause the integer to overflow, setting its value to −(231) which systems will interpret as 231 seconds before epoch (20:45:52 UTC on 13 December 1901). The problem is similar in nature to the year 2000 problem.

      A lot of old PC hardware simply couldn’t scale to modern needs. On the plus side, things like virtualization and 64-bit architecture are helping solve issues like this.

      • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        We actually recently lived through some of the work arounds for Y2K causing issues again. Look up the Y2020 issue. A lot of the fixes for Y2K only pushed the problem out 20 years.

    • Spudwart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If we don’t obliterate ourselves by 2032, then I highly suspect nothing will be done about the 32bit rollover time issue as it becomes politicized, nothing will get fixed and literally the solution is to add another 32 bits in front of the existing 32 bits.