Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1584arrow-down111
arrow-up1573arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·1 year agoPretty much this size
minus-squarenonailsleft@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoThey should just refer to the caliber
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoRelevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Pretty much this size
They should just refer to the caliber
I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm